Odd. I’d have thought that this year’s Hugo shortlist was pretty much uncontroversial. I mean, we have a healthy representation of women and writers of colour, most of the nominations went to works and writers that are popular or at least talked about, there are very few “What the Fuck?” nominees compared with other years (e.g. last year’s nominees included a filk CD and a Hugo acceptance speech from the previous year). Sure, there still are issues, particularly with certain categories, but there always are issues.
Which is why I was surprised to find that this year’s Hugo slate is apparently considered highly controversial in certain corners of the SFF community.
Also posted at Dreamwidth, where there arecomment(s); comment here or there.
- Cora Buhlert's Hugo Nomination Reactions or Why the Fuck is this Controversial?
A post like this one, for example serves both the absolutely legitimate function of decrying sexist attacks from trolls, and works, in a way that makes me roll my eyes, to train some members of the audience to literally apologize for getting a book early and promising to try and buy extra copies. Orbit has the unfortunate tendency to tell its authors all sorts of simply wrong nonsense about the bestseller list, but simply put the stakes are simply not as high as the post suggests they are for books shipping early. I'm not saying that she's lying, mind you, but this is absolutely a rally the troops moment, and it worked, and once the troops are rallied you can get them to vote. That is absolutely in-your-face self-promotion and it works.
I failed to take my pills in a timely manner.
I just want to point out that while she does write for Orbit, the book in the post you linked is a DAW title, and from personal and long experience, DAW doesn't talk about those lists with their authors unless the authors bring them up, and even then, there's not a lot of information handed out.