Sexism: When a man leaves a woman after 25 years, that's "abandonment', but when a woman leaves a man after one, that's "moving on with her life"; when a man has a fantasy involving two women, that's "perverted", but when a woman has a fantasy involving a man and a horse, that's "romantic".
Fortunately, they're equal: when a woman leaves a man after 25 years, that's "abandonment" and when a man leaves a woman after one, it's "moving on with his life."
And if the woman has the man and the horse doing the same thing in her fantasy that the two women are doing in the man's fantasy, well, I suspect it's perverted and illegal in a number of states and provinces. And apparently the Budweiser commercial already got there. (I haven't seen the actual commercial, being in Canada, but Jon Stewart's commentary indicates it's a sexual fantasy.)
Somehow I doubt you've ever had a problem with women coming up and pinching parts of your body, unless you were taking a tour of a slaughter house and a female employee mistook you for part of the inventory.
We intended it to be. The only people we got complaints about were men, that year (well, leading up to that year; we managed to intimidate somebody, I hope the harassers, and didn't get complaints from that convention).
Interesting; that 1992 Minicon is the first one I chaired (and the first one to have a single chair in ages; I'd been on the Executive Committee before), and we put in that policy in response to a number of complaints about a small number of people who had been around local fandom for a while doing inappropriate things.
I'd be surprised if that was actually the first time one was enacted.
Two people were allowed in only after being read the riot act (or our local equivalent) by me or the Operations department head (co-heads?), and were warned that we'd eject them and stop accepting future memberships if there were credible complaints about them. In the event, there were not any complaints about them lodged with me or Operations or our lead person on the anti-harassment effort (who was cakmpls).
As chair of that con, I had no power to bind policy beyond that year. (Actually, the threat to refuse future memberships is also not absolute; I can pass on the recommendation, but I can't enforce it.) I can find no sign of a published policy in the archived materials from last year, and don't remember our having one.
I Am Not A Lawyer, but I think you did a pretty good job of setting a clearly defined policy. I can understand being apprehensive about the nitty-gritty legalities of what constitutes harassment, but when I look at Convergence's anti-harassment policy I see the same basic points being made there in order to discourage people from abusing said policy.
I think the issue is you'd need to begin by finding out when the first convention Harassment Policy was set up, before you can therefore detirmine when the first harassment policy was laid out that encouraged only non-sexual harassment.
2013-02-07 05:15 pm (UTC)
2013-02-07 06:29 pm (UTC)
2013-02-07 06:47 pm (UTC)
(Anonymous)
2013-02-07 05:39 pm (UTC)
Doug M.
2013-02-07 06:36 pm (UTC)
2013-02-07 06:47 pm (UTC)
2013-02-07 09:21 pm (UTC)
And if the woman has the man and the horse doing the same thing in her fantasy that the two women are doing in the man's fantasy, well, I suspect it's perverted and illegal in a number of states and provinces. And apparently the Budweiser commercial already got there. (I haven't seen the actual commercial, being in Canada, but Jon Stewart's commentary indicates it's a sexual fantasy.)
2013-02-07 07:13 pm (UTC)
2013-02-08 01:50 am (UTC)
2013-02-08 03:41 am (UTC)
2013-02-07 07:14 pm (UTC)
http://convergence-con.org/about-us/poli
2013-02-07 07:58 pm (UTC)
2013-02-07 11:23 pm (UTC)
2013-02-08 05:32 pm (UTC)
2013-02-07 09:11 pm (UTC)
I'd be surprised if that was actually the first time one was enacted.
Two people were allowed in only after being read the riot act (or our local equivalent) by me or the Operations department head (co-heads?), and were warned that we'd eject them and stop accepting future memberships if there were credible complaints about them. In the event, there were not any complaints about them lodged with me or Operations or our lead person on the anti-harassment effort (who was
As chair of that con, I had no power to bind policy beyond that year. (Actually, the threat to refuse future memberships is also not absolute; I can pass on the recommendation, but I can't enforce it.) I can find no sign of a published policy in the archived materials from last year, and don't remember our having one.
2013-02-08 12:30 am (UTC)
2013-02-08 03:46 am (UTC)
2013-02-08 05:38 pm (UTC)
2013-02-08 01:30 am (UTC)
2013-02-08 04:29 pm (UTC)
2013-02-08 04:47 pm (UTC)
2013-02-08 08:09 pm (UTC)
2013-02-08 09:04 pm (UTC)
http://www.mnstf.org/minicon16/Minicon_1
I don't remember anyone being lit on fire at least...
Killfile?
2013-02-09 01:42 am (UTC)
Re: Killfile?
2013-02-09 02:52 am (UTC)