I'd never heard about it before this minute, but from the bits and pieces I've found floating around the internet, it looks like the sort of thing John W. Campbell would have leapt at had it crossed his desk fifty or sixty years ago.
The product description does make the work appear to be forty years past its best-by date.
The author must be very young, not to know that when the sarcasm-impaired read backward through a glare of hatred and then attack, it's polite to allow them the option of thinking that you never saw the message.
Well, she has to be young to think that an idea that was old and tired fifty years ago is fresh and startling.
You would think so, but according to her Wikipedia page she was married in Florida in 1991, so at best she's in her late thirties. Even that, I would think, is old enough to recognize a stinker.
As an actress, pretty good. As a director, frigging brilliant--but considering what she was being brilliant in the service of, you want to take a shower with steel wool afterwards to get the psychic slime off.
Yabbut, as one comment I saw pointed out, there's a difference. If even a straight white guy can point out that something seems to be racist/homophobic/sexist, well, odds are pretty good.
Fair enough. (Although, it occurs to me that it's possible that in either case, the actions of SWG-in-question could be perceived as "othering", no? It's still the SWG attempting to demarcate the community standards...)
That statement comes from a website that's been "outing" Goodreads "bullies" (reviewers who dare criticize authors for writing crap) by revealing their real names, addresses, phone numbers, favorite restaurants ... That's high quality analysis by their standards.
I'm white, and except for our housekeeper, everyone I knew in my hometown in the Southeast was white. It was a white world with white actors on TV and white models and white teachers and a white president. There were a few Cuban kids in my private high school, but just a few.
She just wants us to live in a world where we are slightly nicer to those fertile nonwhite people (who are not part of the "us" she is addressing of course) and value them for their inner beauty rather than minding that they aren't pretty! Is that so wrong? I know I tell my son every night while I'm reading Tikki-Tikki-Tembo to him, "your INNER beauty is what matters."
Well, the title of Kaye's editorial might just as well be "I bought this magazine but now I'm having second thoughts, so let's just ram this sucker into the ground as fast as possible."
Or the title could be "Me and my older white male friends would really like to take back the club house and return to the Golden Age, so I'm just going to let this review jump-start the slush pile winnowing process for me".
"The black cannibal thick-lipped rapist savage hordes in my book aren't racist! They've got a third eye and a tail, so they're clearly not black people!"
Thinking of a recent topic, one wonders how well Farnham's Freehold would play today. Or the author's protestations that he's not racist, honest, he's just trying to get people to think ;-)
People who want to experience that nice cozy feeling of being wrongfully persecuted, but without having to sympathize with a non-white or - god forbid - a homosexual.
Well, since racism and homophobia are just perfectly natural outgrowths of the existence of a social norm[1], how could there be anything wrong with imagining all those icky dark/gay people oppressing me? And it's so much easier this way! I get to see them as the horrible monsters everyone secretly knows they oh god I'm going to be sick on my keyboard.
*sigh* --- [1] Because of course if X is the norm then therefore (inevitably following, as a result) Y is socially condemned. Right. Yes. And that means I don't need to worry about anything I might be doing to perpetuate it. Yessss. Right. It just happens all around me, poor little me.
-- am with you on that. (How are you managing? Me, I found out about this at work. I think my wanting to swear is being attributed to flooding at home, which helps.)
Heh. My failure of clarity--how are you coping, not how are you succeeding? (I'm not actually swearing. But I've been here long enough that they can tell when I'm stressed. So.) And the idea, at least, does help...
(I was at the WorldCon where she and Stephen won the award. It was really sort of a lovely thing to see.)
On the other hand, he's also been the editor of a lot of good and popular anthologies of old-time ghost stories. (Ghosts and Masterpieces of Terror and the Supernatural seem to turn up on a lot of people's shelves.) When I heard he was taking over Weird Tales I was cautiously optimistic, as he does seem to have a good eye for spooky fiction.
Cuing right wing bloggers' POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD! denunciations of the reaction to WT doing Save the White People and WT's reaction to the reactions in Three, Two, One.....
2012-08-20 03:32 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 03:47 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 04:43 pm (UTC)
The author must be very young, not to know that when the sarcasm-impaired read backward through a glare of hatred and then attack, it's polite to allow them the option of thinking that you never saw the message.
Well, she has to be young to think that an idea that was old and tired fifty years ago is fresh and startling.
2012-08-20 04:53 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 04:53 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 05:04 pm (UTC)
2012-08-21 03:20 am (UTC)
2012-08-21 03:30 am (UTC)
There's free copies available if you want 'em.
2012-08-21 04:19 am (UTC)
2012-08-21 04:27 am (UTC)
But very well - "Mandingo crossbred with Twilight, as written by Phyllis Schlafly".
Re:
2012-08-21 03:45 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 04:40 pm (UTC)
Ah. I see. Well, if she says she's not, that must be OK then.
Edited at 2012-08-20 04:42 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 04:54 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 05:13 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 05:54 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 06:53 pm (UTC)
Edited at 2012-08-20 07:10 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 05:22 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 06:54 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 05:04 pm (UTC)
It continues here.
2012-08-20 05:13 pm (UTC)
Oh. Dearie. Put down that shovel and move, very slowly, away from the hole...
2012-08-20 05:15 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 05:50 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 05:52 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 05:08 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 05:11 pm (UTC)
(Anonymous)
2012-08-20 05:50 pm (UTC)
"The black cannibal thick-lipped rapist savage hordes in my book aren't racist! They've got a third eye and a tail, so they're clearly not black people!"
Bruce
2012-08-21 01:17 am (UTC)
Target audience for this book:
2012-08-20 05:27 pm (UTC)
Re: Target audience for this book:
2012-08-20 05:50 pm (UTC)
*sigh*
---
[1] Because of course if X is the norm then therefore (inevitably following, as a result) Y is socially condemned. Right. Yes. And that means I don't need to worry about anything I might be doing to perpetuate it. Yessss. Right. It just happens all around me, poor little me.
Edited at 2012-08-20 06:15 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 06:40 pm (UTC)
-- Steve's just here in the corner, shaking his head and trying not to scream.
2012-08-20 07:01 pm (UTC)
-- am with you on that. (How are you managing? Me, I found out about this at work. I think my wanting to swear is being attributed to flooding at home, which helps.)
2012-08-20 07:11 pm (UTC)
-- Steve might just back that if it does come to fruition, even though he's no big fan of the horror genre.
2012-08-20 07:18 pm (UTC)
(I was at the WorldCon where she and Stephen won the award. It was really sort of a lovely thing to see.)
2012-08-20 07:42 pm (UTC)
-- Steve's glad to see that this sort of thing is taken seriously these days.
2012-08-20 10:13 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 10:22 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 10:26 pm (UTC)
http://weirdtalesmagazine.com/2012/08/2
2012-08-20 10:58 pm (UTC)
2012-08-21 04:52 am (UTC)
2012-08-22 06:36 am (UTC)
2012-08-20 11:00 pm (UTC)
2012-08-20 11:04 pm (UTC)
https://twitter.com/oldcharliebrown/sta
2012-08-20 11:20 pm (UTC)
2012-08-21 01:22 pm (UTC)
2012-08-21 01:54 pm (UTC)