Previous Entry Add to Memories Share Next Entry
I'm pretty sure I know what my crazy old man ranting button is going to be
james_nicoll
In a discussion of California's population, in response to


>There are also ethnic considerations - many Hispanic
>girls want to have a big family because they come from a big family -
>even if they are citizens, even if their family has been in the US and
>California for generations. This desire to start young and have a lot
>of kids isn't going away for that ethnic community, which is a
>burgeoning part of our population.


I say
Is there like a law or something that requires the claim of alarming
fecundity in various minority groups during discussions of population
growth? I mean, Ted Turner and his kin breed like mice; he alone has
had five kids and there's no reason to think he's stopped, despite
which I seem to be the only one agitating for a humane or at least
humane-ish capture, neuter and release program for the Turners. What
is it about them that makes people comfortable with the Turners
spilling out over the long suffering Earth like an all consuming
flood of pink, smugly entitled meat but nervous about Hispanics? What
could that subtle factor be?


(various spelling errors fixed or at least altered)

Also posted at Dreamwidth, where there are comment count unavailable comment(s); comment here or there.

People really need to look at demographics. Reproduction rates of immigrant communities decline across generations, no matter what background they come from. Not to mention that reproduction rates are declining in much of the developing world as conditions improve. Iran is a good example, where, despite being run by Islamists, the birth rate has been dropping for years. And of course here in Canada we can point to Quebec, where the birth rate of the primarily Catholic province dropped drastically after 1960. It has been going up some of late, but is still below replacement at 1.74.

And Mexico's TFR is currently identical to that of the United States.